Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 7/18/07, Maxim Veksler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello people,
>>
>> I'm looking for building Heartbeat 2.1.0 on redhat.
>> I've downloaded from http://hg.linux-ha.org/lha-2.1/archive/tip.tar.gz
>>
>> The content of this archive:
>>
>> > tar xzpf tip.tar.gz
>> > ls
>> > Heartbeat-STABLE-2-1-0ad5421d5664 tip.tar.gz
>> > cd Heartbeat-STABLE-2-1-0ad5421d5664/
>> > grep -E 'HAPKGVERSION="[0-9.]+"' configure.in
>> HAPKGVERSION="2.0.9"
>>
>> What gives ?
>
> At the time it was clearly not 2.0.8 anymore but that revision didn't
> become 2.1.0 until afterwards (for various reasons). Hence the
> numbering confusion, which isn't helped by Alan subsequently
> disavowing it and wanting to start with 2.1.1
I never disavowed 2.1.0.
I said we would tag it as 2.1.0, and releasing it was optional.
However, I later said that I would release it, but _after_ I got out
2.1.1. I still plan on doing that.
Given all the complaints about how late 2.1.1 is, I think the wisdom of
waiting is clearer than ever - since it would definitely delay 2.1.1.
I'm still planning on putting out 2.1.0.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
