Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> 
> Thank you for your comment.
> This program isn't considered as a quorum module for now.
> It was developed as RA, I mean, it provides an independent function without
> some effects to Heartbeat's internal behavior.

I understand.  Also, this particular kind of module is not well known.

But, it is _exactly_ where it should be in the architecture.  I'm not
completely against putting it in as a resource agent, but I think it
would be perfect as a quorum module.

Does that make sense to you?


> since we don't have familiar with a quorum module,
> what are the requirements for it?
> We have no problem with improving it, but it's not known exactly how we
> should do.

-- 
    Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship...  Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to