On 8/22/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-08-09T08:26:27, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, just came back from vacation. This is a very interesting discussion, > and I'm very happy to see the RA! > > _But_ ... ;-) > > > I understand. Also, this particular kind of module is not well known. > > > > But, it is _exactly_ where it should be in the architecture. I'm not > > completely against putting it in as a resource agent, but I think it > > would be perfect as a quorum module. > > > > Does that make sense to you? > > Actually, I think the shared disk plugin belongs into the HBcomm layer > (that is, as a full means of communication between the nodes, not just > as a tie-breaker), like the example code Xinwei posted awhile ago. > > Yes, a quorum module would be nice, but as an additional comm link, it > would be even better - because the cluster would keep on working > completely. >
didn't robert threaten to open-source some code that did this? _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
