On 2008-01-31T08:24:08, Tadashiro Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But from our experiences, it is not enough for enterprise use from the view
> of quality. Someone should integrate plural packages and test it intensively.
> It is efficient if all of community member can test one integrated package,
> like PostgreSQL project.
Right; of course the overall combination needs to be tested as well.
Again, this happens naturally when PaceMaker is tested in combination
with heartbeat as the membership layer, which is of course part of the
PaceMaker release process.
Distributors such as Red Hat, SUSE/Novell, Ubuntu etcetera will of
course continue to also perform their own tests of their packages.
Testing the full stack is important; it does not matter whether this
stack has been installed from one or two packages.
For Enterprise use, I cannot resist to add an advertisement for SLES,
where we of course support heartbeat+PaceMaker/CRM for Enterprise usage
and will even accept money for it ;-)
> > openSUSE's Build Service is just that: it provides a build environment
> > for all distributions, not just openSUSE. RedHat, RHEL, CentOS, Debian,
> > Ubuntu, Fedora, and by coincidence openSUSE/SLES as well ;-)
> Do you mean you could accept any modification even if some troubles are found
> in another distribution other than openSUSE?
Certainly! We already do that today; always have, always will. I don't
think we have ever refused a bug on any distribution.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
