On 2008-02-05T09:22:38, Tadashiro Yoshida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want to know current and future situation and to know what the best
> way is for us.
I am not sure I follow here; what "way" do you mean? To me, it doesn't
really appear as if there's any choice of options here.
Yes, there will be an option to chose between heartbeat or openAIS (once
this is stable and working), but right now, there is just one path:
heartbeat + Pacemaker.
> Again, there are no definite conventions and rules how each software
> module should be divided. It depends on the product and project. It's
> apparently up to developers, not me.
Right ;-)
> My understanding in the discussion so far is as follows:
>
> 1) Pacemaker is provided to both of Heartbeat and OpenAIS.
Yes.
> 2) Pacemaker will be released after sedulous test with Heartbeat as well as
> OpenAIS.
Yes.
> 3) Pacemaker will accept any beneficial change from Heartbeat and OpenAIS
> community.
Yes, of course.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
