On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 08:51:35AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > They look good to me. > Thanks for repairing the broken assumptions I had about how > conditionals work with "make dist" !
Hi Andrew, Hi All, I have applied the Debian patches with the exception of the last one, "debian: don't enable mgmt or explicitly disable snmp_subagent" as there is still a little bit of discussion around what to do with snmp_subagent. I have also applied the "make dist" fix "build: Don't distribute tools/attrd.h as it doesn't exist" as there seems to be little discussion around it - that is, I don't think anyone objects to it. I am holding off on applying the "make dist" build fixes until we work out what to do with snmp_subagent as it seems related - the patches are there for anyone who desperately needs them. That said, I am happy to push any or all of these patches and treat what to do with snmp_subagent as a separate issue - which would put the tree into a state where "make dist" works while discussions take place. I have also applied a couple of other ldirectord and debian patches to dev that were in my tree[1] as my keys for commit access to the dev tree have been updated (thanks Sean). [1] http://hg.clusterlabs.org/horms/heartbeat/ * My tree currently contains no changes that aren't in dev and vice versa, although the exact order of commits differs slightly. -- Horms _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
