Hi Lars, We want to consider the pursuit of the cause why there was a problem in RA.
We do not want to cancel the standard error output if possible. About two commands of Filesystem, I intend to have revised it equally. Because I do not understand intention of the practice of all commands, I may have a mistake. Do you think that there is some problem? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2009-11-19T10:06:37, [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi raoul, > > > > > i think it would be better to concat this into one line, something like: > > > ocf_log err "Failed to read device $DEVICE: $err_output" > > > > I imitated it for handling of Filesystem_monitor_20 and thought about a > > revision. > > However, I think that a revision of your patch is better. > > I think that I had better revise the log output of Filesystem_monitor_20. > > > > I attach a patch again. > > Why do you want to clutter the logs with the rm -f or modprobe output? > > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc. > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N将舐nberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
