On 03/02/2010 07:36 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:28:11PM +0100, Ante Karamatić wrote: >> On 01.03.2010 12:55, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> >>> Why would you want to do this? Not implying that it's wrong, that >>> could be a matter of preference, just interested in your >>> motivation. BTW, the upstream rpm creates three packages: >>> cluster-glue, libglue, libglue-dev. >> During the procedure of moving cluster-glue to main component of Ubuntu, >> there was a requirement of splitting those libraries into different >> packages. I guess this could happen in Debian too. >> >> From the perspective that, in the future, there might be other programs >> that would like to, for example, utilize stonith functions but not lrm, >> having those libraries separated would be great. > > Why was there a requirement? Making single packages for every > single library seems like nonsense to me. stonith/lrm/clplumbing > exist for years and I've never heard of anybody using just one or > the other piece. > > What would probably make sense is packaging stonith agents in a > separate package. > >> There are no strong reasons for this, it just seemed right thing to do. >> If upstream thinks this is not ok or false, I'd be ok with dropping this >> change. > > So, unless you come up with more convincing arguments, yes, this > upstream is against. I'd be happy to hear other opinions, of > course.
No need, the package has been uploaded without the multiple-library split: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/cluster-glue_1.0.3+hg2337-1.html Cheers, Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
