On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:36:59PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:28:11PM +0100, Ante Karamatić wrote: > > On 01.03.2010 12:55, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > > > Why would you want to do this? Not implying that it's wrong, that > > > could be a matter of preference, just interested in your > > > motivation. BTW, the upstream rpm creates three packages: > > > cluster-glue, libglue, libglue-dev. > > > > During the procedure of moving cluster-glue to main component of Ubuntu, > > there was a requirement of splitting those libraries into different > > packages. I guess this could happen in Debian too. > > > > From the perspective that, in the future, there might be other programs > > that would like to, for example, utilize stonith functions but not lrm, > > having those libraries separated would be great. > > Why was there a requirement? Making single packages for every > single library seems like nonsense to me. stonith/lrm/clplumbing > exist for years and I've never heard of anybody using just one or > the other piece. > > What would probably make sense is packaging stonith agents in a > separate package. > > > There are no strong reasons for this, it just seemed right thing to do. > > If upstream thinks this is not ok or false, I'd be ok with dropping this > > change. > > So, unless you come up with more convincing arguments, yes, this > upstream is against. I'd be happy to hear other opinions, of > course.
I believe its a recommendation in Debian Policy somewhere which lintian flags. But I agree that it doesn't seem to be necessary in this case. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
