On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 07:58:38PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> I vote for reapplying the patch, bumping the SO name and forgetting >> about the whole thing. > > The only thing I do is move the two new members to the end of the struct,
Oh without question we should do that. Sorry, didn't mean to imply that this was waste of time. Just assumed that would be part of reapplying. > keeping backwards compatibility, before bumping the SO name anyways, > though not from 2.0.0 to 3.0.0, but only to 2.1.0. > > Because I don't see why we would insist on breaking backwards > compatibility, if keeping it is that cheap. > > -- > : Lars Ellenberg > : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability > : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com > > DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
