On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 01:24:05PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2010-04-17T21:04:06, Lars Ellenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is the interdiff: > > > > Bump the so version, note this is the libtool > > "interface:revision:age" way, the resulting soname > > is libplumb.so.2.1.0 > > > > --- a/lib/clplumbing/Makefile.am Thu Apr 15 15:58:50 2010 +0200 > > +++ b/lib/clplumbing/Makefile.am Sat Apr 17 20:31:18 2010 +0200 > > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ > > > > libplumb_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/replace/libreplace.la \ > > $(top_builddir)/lib/pils/libpils.la > > -libplumb_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 2:0:0 > > +libplumb_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 3:0:1 > > I must be completely silly, but from 2:0:0 to 3:0:1 doesn't seem to > imply anything about 2.1.0?
Welcome to the version logic of libtool. > I disagreed about anything that needed a runtime test for code that You don't need to use it. -- : Lars Ellenberg : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
