On 06/08/2011 02:50 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 6/8/2011 10:16 AM, Keisuke MORI wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for all your efforts for the new release.
>>
>>
>> 2011/6/7 Fabio M. Di Nitto <[email protected]>:
>>> Several changes have been made to the build system and the spec file to
>>> accommodate both projects´ needs. The most noticeable change is the
>>> option to select "all", "linux-ha" or "rgmanager" resource agents at
>>> configuration time, which will also set the default for the
>>> spec file.
>>
>> Why is the ldirectord package disabled on RHEL environment?
>> I would expect that it would be built as same as (linux-ha)
>> resource-agents-1.0.4
>> so that we can use the upcoming 3.9.1 as the upgrade version.
> 
> Because ldirectord requires libnet to build and libnet is not available
> on default RHEL (unless you explicitly enable EPEL).
> 
> Florian, last time we spoke, we were trying to avoid adding BR on
> packages that are not part of RHEL, but then to build linux-ha agents we
> need cluster-glue* that are not part of RHEL anyway.
> 
> We should be consistent here.
> 
> I am ok to allow people to build ldirectord.

No objection.

>> We still use the resource-agents/ldirectord on many RHEL systems and
>> if it was missing
>> we can not upgrade them anymore.
> 
> Understood, we are still smoothing a few corners after the merge. It´s
> good people are spotting those bits.
> 
>>
>>
>>> NOTE: About the 3.9.x version (particularly for linux-ha folks): This
>>> version was chosen simply because the rgmanager set was already at
>>> 3.1.x. In order to make it easier for distribution, and to keep package
>>> upgrades linear, we decided to bump the number higher than both
>>> projects. There is no other special meaning associated with it.
>>>
>>> The final 3.9.1 release will take place soon.
>>
>> BTW why not 4.0? :)
>> just curious though.
> 
> There is really nothing major in this release vs 1.0.4 for linux-ha and
> 3.1.x for rgmanager agents, other than co-exist in the same tree.
> 
> We will probably use 4.0 to introduce the new OCF standard and the new
> common clusterlabs/ provider and mark effectively the introduction of
> new features.

I'd agree.

Lars, it's now June, we have our final resource-agents release before we
start actually merging functional code (as opposed to build systems),
and we still don't even have coverage for deprecation in the OCF RA
spec. Can I ask you to please either start working on that spec update
or give up this task so someone else can pick it up?

Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to