Hi Dejna and Lars

 When, for example, it is a logic of the examples of Lars to try both,
 in the case of IPv6, is the check of IPv4 that I enter every time?
 Don't you hate that useless processing enters every time?

 In that case, I think that I should give a parameter such as
OCF_RESKEY_bindaddress.
----------
bind_address="127.0.0.1"
if [ -n "$OCF_RESKEY_bindaddress" ]; then
  bind_address="$OCF_RESKEY_bindaddress"
fi
WGETOPTS="-O- -q -L --no-proxy --bind-address=$bind_address"
----------

Regards,
Tomo

2012年1月17日23:28 Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:07:09AM +0900, nozawat wrote:
>> > Hi Dejan and Lars,
>> >
>> > I send the patch which I revised according to indication of Lars.
>> >
>> > >> OK. I guess that this won't introduce a regression. And I guess
>> > >> that sometimes one may need a newline in the test string.
>> > I seemed to surely take such a step in the past.
>> > However, I thought that the tr processing was deleted that load became 
>> > higher.
>> > Therefore I used the -z option.
>>
>> Thinking about it, maybe to reduce chance of regression,
>> we can try both?
>> I'm not sure about the default order, ipv4 or ipv6 first?
>>
>> for bind_address in 127.0.0.1 ::1 ; do
>>       wget ...
>>       ret=$?
>>       [ $ret = 0 ] && break;
>>       # recent wget could [ $ret != 4 ] && break,
>>       # "Network error". But older wget return 1...
>> done
>>
>> Dejan?
>
> Yes, that looks like the best way.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
>> --
>> : Lars Ellenberg
>> : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability
>> : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com
>>
>> DRBD(R) and LINBIT(R) are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
>> _______________________________________________________
>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

Reply via email to