Hi Dejan I was very sorry to mistake the spelling of your name (in the previous email).
Regards, Tomo 2012年1月18日11:19 nozawat <[email protected]>: > Hi Dejna and Lars > > When, for example, it is a logic of the examples of Lars to try both, > in the case of IPv6, is the check of IPv4 that I enter every time? > Don't you hate that useless processing enters every time? > > In that case, I think that I should give a parameter such as > OCF_RESKEY_bindaddress. > ---------- > bind_address="127.0.0.1" > if [ -n "$OCF_RESKEY_bindaddress" ]; then > bind_address="$OCF_RESKEY_bindaddress" > fi > WGETOPTS="-O- -q -L --no-proxy --bind-address=$bind_address" > ---------- > > Regards, > Tomo > > 2012年1月17日23:28 Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>: >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:07:09AM +0900, nozawat wrote: >>> > Hi Dejan and Lars, >>> > >>> > I send the patch which I revised according to indication of Lars. >>> > >>> > >> OK. I guess that this won't introduce a regression. And I guess >>> > >> that sometimes one may need a newline in the test string. >>> > I seemed to surely take such a step in the past. >>> > However, I thought that the tr processing was deleted that load became >>> > higher. >>> > Therefore I used the -z option. >>> >>> Thinking about it, maybe to reduce chance of regression, >>> we can try both? >>> I'm not sure about the default order, ipv4 or ipv6 first? >>> >>> for bind_address in 127.0.0.1 ::1 ; do >>> wget ... >>> ret=$? >>> [ $ret = 0 ] && break; >>> # recent wget could [ $ret != 4 ] && break, >>> # "Network error". But older wget return 1... >>> done >>> >>> Dejan? >> >> Yes, that looks like the best way. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dejan >> >>> -- >>> : Lars Ellenberg >>> : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability >>> : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com >>> >>> DRBD(R) and LINBIT(R) are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev >>> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ >> _______________________________________________________ >> Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
