On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:37:52AM -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > I'm getting the following warnings in the log, is it something I should > investigate or is it not to worry? I've seen 14 in the last 18 hours, on > a pair of fairly lightly loaded development servers, with no pattern of > when they occur. They were mostly overnight as well, when no one was > using them (three of the warnings did not have the third line below, > indicating "took too long to execute"): > > lrmd[4809]: 2007/04/27_01:34:20 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function > for SIGCHLD was delayed 1000 ms (> 100 ms) before being called (GSource: > 0x615098) > lrmd[4809]: 2007/04/27_01:34:20 info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at > 512110842 should have started at 512110742 > lrmd[4809]: 2007/04/27_01:34:20 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function > for SIGCHLD took too long to execute: 60 ms (> 10 ms) (GSource: > 0x615098)
Most of the time there's nothing to worry about. The latter example notes a 60ms vs. 10ms. Perhaps you have a backup running. The former one is a bit different, looks like there was a delay involved, nothing to do with the machine's load. Alan said something about removing or rewording these warnings. It'd be nice if we could also tie them to the actual operation which has been delayed. > > Thanks, > Doug Knight > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems -- Dejan _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
