On 2007-05-15T10:47:43, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fairness to SUSE, it was solely my doing while I learnt how to use
> the openSUSE build service. The version there isnt an official SUSE
> release either.
>
> To be honest I didnt know what to call it... 2.0.8 seemed wrong (since
> there was an extra 4-5 months development in there) but there is no
> real 2.0.9 either... oh well.
Well, the version in mercurial does identify itself as 2.0.9 when build.
Maybe, to reflect the intermediate state, 2.0.8.999 would have been
better.
Sincerely,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
