On 5/16/07, Bernhard Limbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The confusing part is that all the versions you are referring to call
themselves 2.0.9, although this was not officially released yet, was it?
correct, and it wont be
The baseline seems to be 2.0.8, so why aren't they called 2.0.8-xx?
partly because the build service reserves the -xx namespace
partly because 2.0.9 was unlikely to be used
partly because of the new features that were added
partly because it was as much based on 2.0.8 as it was on 2.0.7 and
2.0.6 before it...
partly because the changeset was significantly larger than for 2.0.7->2.0.8:
# hg diff -r STABLE-2.0.8:tip | diffstat | tail -n 1
1129 files changed, 40768 insertions(+), 34758 deletions(-)
and partly because I thought we'd have a release by now and I'd never
have point people to the results of my experimentation.
It would be great if on the official webpage one could find a reference to or a tarball of a more
stable release of a particular version (at the moment its always release "1" only, e.g.:
2.0.7-1, 2.0.8-1,...). After all the official page claims to provide "stable" releases of
each version ;o))
Regards,
Bernhard
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:47:22 +0200
Von: "Andrew Beekhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "General Linux-HA mailing list" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] What heartbeat version to install now ?
> On 5/15/07, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew, you used to periodically update the stable Mercury repositary
> > but it looks like you aren;t doing this anymore. Why?
>
> I assume you mean:
> http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat
>
> Its not been updated because there has been no release to update it from.
>
> > Putting HB built
> > from development version into production isn't an appropriate
> > solution,
>
> What is a released version if not a development version thats passed
> some testing hurdle? The problem here, is that the version in
> question was certified by SUSE for SLES users and there was no
> corresponding official community release.
>
> What is available though, is binaries for fedora, debian as well as a
> number of older SUSE platforms built from the same source at:
> http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/ha-clustering/
>
> I've also been campaigning for the ability to build for other
> archs+distro combinations, but this is a work in progress.
>
>
> > using 2.0.8 as you siad isn;t a good way too and there is no
> > current stable build anymore.
>
> go back and look at the first line of my initial response.
> its not a situation i'm particularly happy about either but we hope to
> have the situation rectified "soon".
>
> >
> > On 5/15/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 5/15/07, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I'm about to install Heartbeat on a fresh Debian 4 system, and I was
> > > > wondering wich version of heartbeat I should install ?
> > > > Some bugs have been corrected since v2.0.8, and I would like to
> install
> > > > these corrections too. So should I install v2.0.8 and apply the
> patches
> > > > that I want, or install the latest development version ?
> > > >
> > > > If you think there's no major problem installing latest snapshot,
> where
> > > > can I find it ? here ? :
> http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/tip.tar.bz2
> > > > Any other version to suggest ?
> > >
> > > A question with a rather unsatisfactory answer I'm afraid.
> > >
> > > I wouldn't recommend 2.0.8 - both due to its age and some rather
> > > unpleasant bugs and memory leaks it contained.
> > >
> > > But I also wouldn't recommend the latest snapshot either as the lrmd
> > > is in a rather sorry state.
> > >
> > > The link posted by Sam is probably the best bet for pre-built
> > > packages. Otherwise, if one is comfortable with building from
> > > scratch, I would use:
> > >
> > > http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/SLE10-SP1.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > which is what will be going into SLES10, SP1 and was the subject of a
> > > respectable amount of testing.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Benjamin
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
