Eddie C schrieb: > I am sorry if I was slightly unclear. > > When I attempt to download http://www.multinet.de/LLS/IPaddr2 there is > a non asci character on the 9th line. > > Marowsky-Br?e. Implements Cluster Alias IP functionality too. > > and again on the 13th line > > # Copyright (c) 2004-2006 SUSE LINUX AG, Lars Marowsky-Br?e > > I copied the script into my /usr/lib/ocf/heartbeat folder (where the > other scripts live) and renamed the old one on both systems and > restarted heartbeat. I also made it executable I checked my linux > distribution FC5 for the kernel module and it does exist. > Hi,
thanks for the comments. At leat someone who really read my script ;-) These characters should have no influence, since these lines are just comments. If it distrubs you, just delete these lines. Anyway, I will change these lines in the script. Thanks. > I attempted to a setup identical to the process in your PDF, but I > noticed a few things. The > description of the IPAddr2 in my main window was blank. Also IP was > not a required attirbute. I am not sure if it should be. I thought the > weird character might be effecting this. Yes. It is not required. You always can add the IP address afterwards. Perhaps I should make it mandatory. > I tried this process twice. Once by using wget. The second time by > copying the text from notepad and pasting it into a terminal vi > window. I even tried to remove the character just to be safe. > > I added the IP and clusterhash parameters manually. The service did > attempt to start , however it came up as unmanaged. Although I was > thinking about this after I got home ( sad I know ) and I MIGHT have > had iptables off for testing and ofcourse that would cause this to > fail ill confirm that later. You mention that you use FC5. See my post on this list from Apr 7th. I tested FC5 and FC6. Both did not work at that time. Please read http://flaviostechnotalk.com/wordpress/index.php/2005/06/12/loadbalancer-less-clusters-on-linux/ And check menually if the CLUSTERIP target works on your installation. > I also had a question as well. > In your document you suggest > clone_max=2 > and clone_node_max=2 > > I was under the impression that clone_node_max was the number of > clones that could appear on one node. Does it make sense for two > clones to appear on the same node? > It makes sense in the following scenario: Cluster from two nodes. One fails and the other one has to take over. Then two clones have to run on one node. Michael. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
