On 6/18/07, Max Hofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 18 June 2007, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 6/17/07, Christian Rishøj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/16/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I am *assuming* clones works with colocation, because I can do:
> > >
> > > you can. but later versions have gotten better in that respect.
> > >
> > > I'm guessing you're using 2.0.8 right?
> >
> > No, 2.0.7-2.
> >
> >
> > > you might want to try the packages available at:
> > > http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/ha-clustering/
> >
> > Running Ubuntu, so I'm afraid the Suse packages is not an option.
>
> if you clicked the link you'd see there are also fedora, ubuntu,
> debian and mandriva packages there
What changeset (tag) is this version?
SLE10-SP1 aka 2.1.0 (see: http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/tags)
plus a bunch of debian packaging changes from horms
Horms: will there be a backport for Debian Sarge? (if you need help let me
know)
>
> > Would you recommend compiling from source or CVS?
> >
> >
> > > since 2.0.8 came out, a colocation constraints such as:
> > > <rsc_collocate from=A to=B score=INFINITY/>
> > >
> > > should be read as:
> > > figure out where B is/goes, and then put A there too.
> > >
> > > so in your case, from=... should be your IP address and to=... the
> > > webserver and database clones
> >
> > Aha! I have been interpreting the colocation in the opposite way.
> > Would you happen to know which behavior applies to 2.0.7.x?
>
> i don't believe 2.0.7 supports the behavior you're after
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
