> All the other apps where referenced by their full /path/to/executable. > Why wasn't FSCK? Secondly, without a path shouldn't it have looked in > $PATH or is $PATH blank for the user that Filesystem runs as? If the > later is the case, why would 'fsck' work then? Is this worthy of a bug > being filed?
If you look in the Heartbeat source http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/file/55132e3d3f3c/resources/OCF/Filesystem.in for that file, you will find: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ Which should be replaced with the correct path to fsck by the build process. This issue is therefore with the build process for your particular package. Where are your binary packages coming from? Who compiled them? What platform? HTH Yan _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
