Hi > It's an on-going discussion between Andrew and myself whether start > failures should not simply increase the failcount by a configurable > amount as well - if this defaulted to INFINITY, the current behaviour > would still apply, but finer granularity would also be possible.
It has understood. We will wait ..what discussion it becomes... In conclusion, isn't there means in the current version except reactivation? Regard, Yamauchi. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lars > Marowsky-Bree > Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 8:57 PM > To: General Linux-HA mailing list > Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] About how to return the resource that > fails in thestart processing > > > On 2007-06-30T05:59:13, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In this situation, is there the method how it is easy to return > the resource > > that failed in a start to an original node? > > crm_resource -C can be used to cleanup the failed start. > > It's an on-going discussion between Andrew and myself whether start > failures should not simply increase the failcount by a configurable > amount as well - if this defaulted to INFINITY, the current behaviour > would still apply, but finer granularity would also be possible. > > > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
