On 7/30/07, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a topic that was talked about here before, > could I confirm it again? > my concern is; > failcount isn't increased when a resource fails to start.
this is something that will be changed "soon" start failures are (today) treated as a special case in that the resource simply cant run on that node anymore... so updating the failcount seemed somewhat redundant > a failure status of start op can be cleaned using 'crm_resource -C', > but using both 'crm_resource' and 'crm_failcount' depending on the status > leads to a slight confusion. > I think administrators should master it, > it's just confined to users or operators. > I don't understand what will be going on if start-fail increases a > failcount, > could you please explain it again? the idea is that eventually we'll remove the special start-failure logic in the PE and instead set failcount to INFINITY. which achieves the same result in the end, but is a little cleaner to implement and cleanup (ie. with crm_failcount). > anyway, I took notice of the new message means 'start operation failed' on > crm_mon in the latest version. > not bad at all! glad you like :-) _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
