On 8/7/07, Adrian Chapela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I am here again.. :D
> Andrew Beekhof escribió:
> > On 7/19/07, Adrian Chapela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, but if by any cause I startup the secondary node first the primary
> >> node, the resource group will go to the primary node??
> >> How Can I have a rule/attribute/something wich assign initial placement
> >> to the same node ???
> >>
> >
> > define "same"?
> >
> I have two nodes: first node is named node1 and second node is named node2.
>
> I want to run resource group in node1 and only if this node fails, the
> resource group must be moved to node2.
>
> One thing, if node2 startup before than node1, I want when node1 goes up
> it must run the resource group. Is thi s possible ??

write a rsc_location constraint that prefers node1 with a score of X
set default_resource_stickiness to Y

n*X > Y, where n := number of resources in the group

> >>> unless its the pingd rule that is preventing some of the nodes from
> >>> taking over the resource
> >>>
> >> I don't understand, If the pingd has the same value in the two nodes
> >> (two nodes have not network failures...) the pingd rule hasn't a effect
> >> at all no ?? The rule has only effect in a node with network problems, I
> >> think ..
> >>
> >
> > it depends on how you write the rule(s)
> >
> We can forget pingd for all, but Can you write me a rule to do what I
> want ??
>
> I want a resource group running a node1 until this node fails. When this
> node fails resource group must be moved to node2 and then it never can
> be moved to the node1 again.
>
> Also, I need a clone to run a resource in two nodes at the same time. If
> this clone fails, resource group must be moved to node2... etc...
>
> This is I want but is it possible ?? I think not. What do you think ??

colocate(from=groupname to=clonename)
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to