On 9/13/07, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Afraid I can't offer an answer here. Though, in case the "not
> > running" part was unexpected, i.e. the resource had been started,
>
> Yes I meant the resource is running first and crashes later on, so that
> monitor reports "not running".

generally, one shouldn't report "not running" in such cases

> > then it seems to be wrong to calculate scores differently.
>
> Well that depends. If you say "not running", so why apply stickiness, as
> it is not running anyways, it would make sense.

That is correct.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to