On 9/21/07, HIDEO YAMAUCHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I constituted a cluster in two nodes. > I operated the next... > > 1)I cause a monitor error in an active node(rh44-1). > 2)failcount of the active node becomes 1. > 3)A resource moves to a standby node(rh44-2). > 4)I stop a standby node(rh44-2). > 5)The resource does not run anywhere. > 6)I pushed the CLENAUP RESOURCE button with GUI(hb_gui). > 7)failcount is 1, but a resource runs in the first > node(rh44-1). > > I think that it is strange that the resource starts in the > first node till failcount clears it. > > How do you think?
I noticed this the other day when testing the no colocation code. The problem is that the fail-count for rscX on nodeY isn't applied when there are no actions for rscX on nodeY (which happens when you click the cleanup button). If you'd like to log a bug for it, I'll make sure it gets fixed. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
