Hi, I understood it.
Registered to Bugzilla.(1710) Thank you Andrew. --- Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/21/07, HIDEO YAMAUCHI > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I constituted a cluster in two nodes. > > I operated the next... > > > > 1)I cause a monitor error in an active > node(rh44-1). > > 2)failcount of the active node becomes 1. > > 3)A resource moves to a standby node(rh44-2). > > 4)I stop a standby node(rh44-2). > > 5)The resource does not run anywhere. > > 6)I pushed the CLENAUP RESOURCE button with > GUI(hb_gui). > > 7)failcount is 1, but a resource runs in the first > > node(rh44-1). > > > > I think that it is strange that the resource > starts in the > > first node till failcount clears it. > > > > How do you think? > > I noticed this the other day when testing the no > colocation code. > > The problem is that the fail-count for rscX on nodeY > isn't applied > when there are no actions for rscX on nodeY (which > happens when you > click the cleanup button). > > If you'd like to log a bug for it, I'll make sure it > gets fixed. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
