On 10/24/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 02:26:05PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On 10/24/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 09:21:22PM +1000, Spam Filter wrote: > > > > >HAv2 tries to shoot the node which has to be. So, it's possible that it > > > > >shoots itself, as far as I know. But why are you concerned about that? > > > > > > > > Only concerned because I saw another stonith script protect itself from > > > > shooting itself and I just wanted to make sure that HA2 isn't just > > > > sending the complete list for who knows what reason. > > > > If it's definitely sending only the hostlist of nodes it definitely > > > > wants to stonith then fine.. If it's possible that HA2 may think it > > > > should stonith itself and the HA community thinks it's something that > > > > does happen then that's fine too, I'll remove my anti-foot shooting > > > > parts I've just added in. > > > > > > The stonithd (i.e. the program which runs the stonith show) > > > should prevent suicides. Please let us know if it doesn't. > > > > really? how come? > > Beat me. That's what it does in the code which I recently > reviewed. With the exception of testing, i.e. if it's run with > '-t'.
i think thats a mistake a 1-node cluster could conceivably want to shoot itself in case of a resource failure but i could be mistaken _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
