Hi, On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:46:47AM +0200, matilda matilda wrote: > >>> "Andrew Beekhof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 25.10.2007 10:09 >>> > > one primitive total or one per machine? > > if the later, a rsc_location constraint telling it not to run on its > > own host would be enough > > One per machine and resticted to run on the other...what have you thought? > ;-))
That should suffice. BTW, I don't think this (don't wanna kill meself) is a very serious issue, because a typical situation is that another node does a reset. > > but long term i think the filtering logic needs to be removed from > > stonithd - but then its not me that has to do it :-) > > I think so, too. > I'm anxious to hear what Dejan says. :-) I'll open a bugzilla and see what others say about it. Thanks, Dejan > Have a nice day > Andreas Mock > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
