Thank you for replying, Andrew and Dejan. And I understand the rule.
2007/12/13, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:45:46AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > > On Dec 12, 2007, at 7:41 AM, DAIKI MATSUDA wrote: > > > >> Hi, All. > >> > >> I recently make own RA and mentioned the odd behaviour for monitor. It > >> is that without writing > >> <operations> > >> <op id="test1:monitor" name="monitor" interval="10s" > >> timeout="10s" start_delay="30s" on_fail="restart"/> > >> </operations> > >> for primitive directive in cib.xml, the RA does not monitor its service. > >> > >> In my thinking, the default value is decided in meta-data action, e.g. > >> <action name="monitor" depth="0" timeout="30" interval="10" > >> start-delay="30" /> > >> is the default value for monitoring for 10s intervals. > >> > >> Or, have I to write the monitor operation in the cib.xml obviously? > > Yes. The meta-data is just an example. You need a monitor > operation definition in the CIB. > > > looks right to me - it should wait 30s and then start performing monitor > > ops. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > probably worth logging a bug with a hb_report archive > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
