2007/12/19, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 6:28 AM, DAIKI MATSUDA wrote:
>
> > Hi, Andrew.
> >
> > I am sorry for delay because I was not aware of requiring logs. And I
> > attached the hb_report log.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > MATSUDA, Daiki
> >
> > 2007/12/12, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> On Dec 12, 2007, at 7:41 AM, DAIKI MATSUDA wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, All.
> >>>
> >>> I recently make own RA and mentioned the odd behaviour for
> >>> monitor. It
> >>> is that without writing
> >>>        <operations>
> >>>          <op id="test1:monitor" name="monitor" interval="10s"
> >>> timeout="10s" start_delay="30s" on_fail="restart"/>
> >>>        </operations>
> >>> for primitive directive in cib.xml, the RA does not monitor its
> >>> service.
> >>>
> >>> In my thinking, the default value is decided in meta-data action,
> >>> e.g.
> >>> <action name="monitor" depth="0" timeout="30" interval="10" start-
> >>> delay="30" />
> >>> is the default value for monitoring for 10s intervals.
> >>>
> >>> Or, have I to write the monitor operation in the cib.xml obviously?
>
> I think I misunderstood the question.
>
> the meta-data is not used by the cluster directly.  it only provides
> hints to GUIs.
> if you want the cluster to monitor a resource's health, you need
> specify a monitor action in the CIB - resource's are not monitored by
> default.
>
>
> does that answer your query?

I understood the behaviour and rule. Because I felt that you want to
the hb_report's log, I sent.

> >>>
> >>
> >> looks right to me - it should wait 30s and then start performing
> >> monitor ops.
> >>
> >> probably worth logging a bug with a hb_report archive
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >>
> > <
> > monitor
> > .tar
> > .gz><nonmonitor.tar.gz>_______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to