Version is 2.1.2.

To directly answer your second question:
----------------------


============
Last updated: Tue Jan  8 17:45:50 2008
Current DC: node1.domain.com (6c95a2d9-6158-4b0b-bc02-ff58fb48fd29)
2 Nodes configured.
1 Resources configured.
============

Node: node2.domain.com (03355d20-8527-4fab-8f16-e01817c3fc18): OFFLINE
Node: node1.domain.com (6c95a2d9-6158-4b0b-bc02-ff58fb48fd29): online

Full list of resources:

Resource Group: group_samba
    resource_samba_ip   (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr):        Started
node1.domain.com
    resource_samba_storage      (lsb:hb-vxvol): Started node1.domain.com
    resource_samba_daemon       (lsb:hb-samba): Started node1.domain.com

Failed actions:
    resource_samba_storage_monitor_0 (node=node1.domain.com, call=3, rc=9):
Error
----------------------

So it does start.  I was wrong.  (To give some context, yesterday I
discovered the need for my resource scripts to understand 'monitor' and
'meta-data', and I got those working[1].  This morning, I implemented dummy
versions of 'validate-all', 'promote', 'demote', and 'notify'[2].  One of
these changes must have fixed that issue...)

However, as soon as I start heartbeat on node2, the resource group fails
over to node2 still.

Andrew: I will research default-resource-stickiness

[1] Though I don't understand why 'resource_samba_storage_monitor_0 keeps
giving Error.
[2] to satisy ocf-tester.  Once I figure out how parameters, validate-all
and promote/demote/notify work, I'll implement something better than 'exit
0'...

On Jan 8, 2008 12:16 PM, Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello Jason,
> what version are you using? What is the output of "crm_mon -1 -r" when
> you stop heartbeat on two nodes and than start only on node1.
>
>        Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to