Hello Dejan,

> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752

> According to this, it does matter. There really is a check in
> stonithd which prevents a node to stonith itself.

> So, I'd say that there should be a location constraint which says
> not to run a stonith resource on the same node which is to be
> fenced by that stonith resource. Otherwise, the stonith resource
> is going to be started, but it won't do its job should the need
> arise.

Thank you a lot for the clarification. So I let my setup as it is.

        Thomas
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to