Hi Dejan, hi all, > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> > Gesendet: 31.01.08 11:08:04 > An: General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Monitor Retry > > > So the question is: > > Does the resource run in a way able to fulfill it's service? (Yes/No) > > But IMHO this question implies that the RA tries/should try to do as much > > as necessary to test the service-ability. This can be pretty much. > > Sometimes too much if the service is doing what it should: Working hard! > > That's why multiple levels of monitoring are available.
What do you mean with that? Are there RA out there which do different kind of monitoring controlled by different parameters? > > > Timeout means: Nothing, no answer. > > That's equivalent to no service. We can't say why though. Is this the right/current interpretation? > There's still certain set of resources which are (unfortunately) > unreliable and can occasionaly timeout. I can recall some STONITH > devices which would timeout once out of a hundred times or so. > For those, a monitor failure could be considered transient. I got a deja vu. :-)) But anyway...the stonith discussion is stuck. Best regards Andreas Mock _____________________________________________________________________ Unbegrenzter Speicherplatz für Ihr E-Mail Postfach? Jetzt aktivieren! http://www.digitaledienste.web.de/freemail/club/lp/?lp=7 _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
