> > Also, if this is to be universal for other snmp resettable devices > the > > OID and outlet should be combined, because the OID is actually not > > complete until an outlet number is added. Why not just combine them > for > > compatibility? > > Yes, we could obviously do that. It could be a matter of > preference though. The outlet combined with the OID is not easily > visible, or at least not as easy as when it stands by itself. > I think that we could keep it as it is. > > What worries me more are the reset/off/on values which are not > configurable. Are they standard (for whichever value of standard)? [Damon Estep]
Agreed, they should be configurable, however you must consider that if a device requires a string instead of integer the snmpset command will require a modifier other than 'i', so it gets even trickier. Perhaps we should look for a case where it will be useful other than the APC PDU, are you aware of any other snmp enabled devices that support write to reset, on, and off? I would imagine most of the ilo cards form dell, hp, and ibm do. I think adding the nodename and allowing modification of the OID for different rack PDU devices form APC is good enough until a case arises for something else snmp. > > QUESTION: how do you get the HB GUI to show the new parameters? The > GUI > > still shows the old parameter list, although it is configurable from > the > > GUI by just adding the missing parameters. > > I think that GUI auto-discovers the possible parameters, perhaps > you'll have to restart it. [Damon Estep] Actually, it was a dumb question. I had overlooked that the GUI was running on a box that is not in the cluster, and I never updated the rackpdu plugin on that machine, just the cluster nodes, my mistake. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
