On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:13:48PM +0100, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >  On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:56:07AM +0100, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> >  > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Sebastian Reitenbach
> >  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >  > > Hi,
> >  > >
> >  > >  I want to achieve the following:
> >  > >  I have two groups of resources, these shall run on the same host, and
> >  > >  startup in a given order.
> >  > >
> >  > >  Therefore I created an order and an collocation constraint.
> >  > >  So group1 starts before group2, and the collocation says, if group1 
> > is not
> >  > >  able to run on a node, group2 will not start.
> >  > >
> >  > >  However, if all resources in group1 are started, then the resources in
> >  > >  group2 are started too. But when I then shutdown any single resource 
> > in
> >  > >  group1, then group2 stops working too.
> >  > >  I am not sure, whether my collocation or order is the reason for the
> >  > >  observed behavior.
> >  >
> >  > I have not tried it by myself but there are these "Advisory-Only
> >  > Ordering" constraints:
> >  >
> >  > <rsc_order id="orderid" from="res2" to="res1" score="0"/>
> >
> >  Good advice. Though even when all of the group1 is stopped,
> >  group2 won't stop either.
> 
> According to the documentation it should ... and after doing some
> ptests, I see it does ;-). If the complete group1 is stopped, group2
> is stopped to. If only one resource in group1 is stopped, group2 does
> nothing.

Darn. I'll never be able to get it right. Thanks for clarifying.

Dejan

> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> >
> >
> >  > ... have a look at Andrews Pacemaker manual ...
> >  > http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/images/f/fb/Configuration_Explained.pdf
> >  >
> >  > Regards,
> >  > Andreas
> >  >
> >  > >
> >  > >  Right now, from what I observed, it seems, that when I stop just one
> >  > >  resource in the group, then the group itself is seen as stopped, and 
> > the
> >  > >  group2 stops then too.
> >
> >  Well, this sounds logical to me.
> >
> >
> >  > >  My question is, is there a parameter or something to keep the group
> >  > >  as "started", until all resources in the group, or the group 
> > completely is
> >  > >  set to be stopped? is that possible?
> >  > >
> >  > >  Otherwise I'd have use very many single resources, and very many 
> > order and
> >  > >  collocation constraints.
> >
> >  Or rethink the strategy. Perhaps show the services you have in mind.
> >
> >  If the case is plausible, then the crm should be improved.
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >  Dejan
> >
> >
> >
> >  > >  cheers
> >  > >  Sebastian
> >  > >
> >  > >  _______________________________________________
> >  > >  Linux-HA mailing list
> >  > >  [email protected]
> >  > >  http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >  > >  See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >  > >
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > Linux-HA mailing list
> >  > [email protected]
> >  > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >  > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Linux-HA mailing list
> >  [email protected]
> >  http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >  See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to