On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Andreas Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:56:07AM +0100, Andreas Kurz wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Sebastian Reitenbach > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I want to achieve the following: > > > > I have two groups of resources, these shall run on the same host, and > > > > startup in a given order. > > > > > > > > Therefore I created an order and an collocation constraint. > > > > So group1 starts before group2, and the collocation says, if group1 > is not > > > > able to run on a node, group2 will not start. > > > > > > > > However, if all resources in group1 are started, then the resources > in > > > > group2 are started too. But when I then shutdown any single resource > in > > > > group1, then group2 stops working too. > > > > I am not sure, whether my collocation or order is the reason for the > > > > observed behavior. > > > > > > I have not tried it by myself but there are these "Advisory-Only > > > Ordering" constraints: > > > > > > <rsc_order id="orderid" from="res2" to="res1" score="0"/> > > > > Good advice. Though even when all of the group1 is stopped, > > group2 won't stop either. > > According to the documentation it should ... and after doing some > ptests, I see it does ;-). If the complete group1 is stopped, group2 > is stopped to. If only one resource in group1 is stopped, group2 does > nothing.
Maybe I've been on vacation too long, but that sounds strange. Where did I write that? I'd have expected group2 to keep running in either case. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
