I don't know if my company's spam filters caught any response, and since I haven't seen any answers I thought I'd repost my query. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks, Doug On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 10:52 -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > All, > I am currently running heartbeat 2.0.8 (plans to upgrade are in the > works). I have a group of similar processes, currently configured as > ordered="true" and collocated="true", with the attributes within the > group tag in the XML. I have a group constraint to set the preferred > node for the group. I modified the ordered attribute of the group tag > from "true" to "false", leaving the collocated attribute set to > "true". When I do that, the processes all start up asynchronously, as > expected, but the processes are no longer collocated (in fact they > evenly distribute between the two systems, 5 one one, 4 on the other). > Am I mis-interpreting the ordered attribute? I saw in the online > examples that collocation there is done via an rsc_colocation > constraint. Are these two different ways of enforcing collocation? The > group definition and constraint are shown below. If more information > is needed please let me know. > > <group ordered="false" collocated="true" id="grp_decoders"> > ... > > <rsc_location id="locate_decoders" rsc="grp_decoders"> > <rule id="rule_decoders_on_sysp" score="100"> > <expression id="exp_decoders_on_sw" attribute="#uname" > operation="eq" value="sysp"/> > </rule> > </rsc_location> > > > > Thanks, > Doug Knight > WSI Corp > Andover, MA > > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
