Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:52:19AM -0400, Doug Knight wrote: > All, > I am currently running heartbeat 2.0.8 (plans to upgrade are in the > works). I have a group of similar processes, currently configured as > ordered="true" and collocated="true", with the attributes within the > group tag in the XML. I have a group constraint to set the preferred > node for the group. I modified the ordered attribute of the group tag > from "true" to "false", leaving the collocated attribute set to "true". > When I do that, the processes all start up asynchronously, as expected, > but the processes are no longer collocated (in fact they evenly > distribute between the two systems, 5 one one, 4 on the other). Am I > mis-interpreting the ordered attribute?
No. It looks like a bug to me, but probably something which has been fixed in the meantime. You should try to upgrade to 2.1.3. > I saw in the online examples > that collocation there is done via an rsc_colocation constraint. Are > these two different ways of enforcing collocation? Apparently, a group is just a shortcut for a set of order and colocate constraints. > The group definition > and constraint are shown below. If more information is needed please let > me know. > > <group ordered="false" collocated="true" id="grp_decoders"> > ... > > <rsc_location id="locate_decoders" rsc="grp_decoders"> > <rule id="rule_decoders_on_sysp" score="100"> > <expression id="exp_decoders_on_sw" attribute="#uname" > operation="eq" value="sysp"/> > </rule> > </rsc_location> This looks fine. Thanks, Dejan > > > Thanks, > Doug Knight > WSI Corp > Andover, MA > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
