On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello - > > > > Would it be possible to issue a bugfix release for Heartbeat 2.1.3 in > > the old version of packaging, i.e. without Pacmaker as a separate > > package? > > Basically no. > As indicated back in December, 2.1.3 was the last combined release. > The CRM from that release is now being maintained as the Pacemaker 0.6 > stable series which has monthly _bug-fix-only_ updates. > > Even if I wanted to, and the maintenance overhead of back-porting > everything wasn't a show-stopper, I'm not the one who's allowed to > authorize a release.
Then my other questions is: Who supports current Heartbeat packages suitable for Pacemaker and where I can get sources for them with appropriate .spec files? Of course it's not my business, but I think that you guys are badly hurting a whole project. For example Apache officially closed 2.0.XX branch and suggest everybody to move to 2.2.X, but they still issue bugfixes and security patches for that branch. In your case you suggest people to move to 2.1.3, which is known to have some critical bugs. Of course you can suggest to move to Pacemaker + Heartbeat, but packages for such move are available from your site only and you don't have packages for some critical OSes like RHEL 4.0/CentOS 4.0. -- Serge Dubrouski. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
