On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Johan Hoeke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > > On Mar 18, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Hello - > >>>> > >>>> Would it be possible to issue a bugfix release for Heartbeat 2.1.3 in > >>>> the old version of packaging, i.e. without Pacmaker as a separate > >>>> package? > >>> > >>> Basically no. > >>> As indicated back in December, 2.1.3 was the last combined release. > >>> The CRM from that release is now being maintained as the Pacemaker 0.6 > >>> stable series which has monthly _bug-fix-only_ updates. > >>> > >>> Even if I wanted to, and the maintenance overhead of back-porting > >>> everything wasn't a show-stopper, I'm not the one who's allowed to > >>> authorize a release. > >> > >> > >> Then my other questions is: Who supports current Heartbeat packages > >> suitable for Pacemaker and where I can get sources for them with > >> appropriate .spec files? > > > > Source rpms are available at the link below: > > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/ha-clustering/ > > > > Essentially^, it is the _official_ 2.1.3 sources with a spec file that > > doesn't build the CRM. > > If you have any questions about the spec file, I'd be happy to answer them. > > > > I know it would be nice if we had RHEL4 binaries too, see below, but you > > should be able to do a rpm rebuild without issue. > > I'm not having much luck with that :(
What problems are you running into? _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
