Hi Andreas,

>  >  Hmm I'm not sure how to configure the VLAN interface as you describe.
>  >  I am sure I need to build it as it's own device.  It can't as far as I
>  >  know be a sub interface of an already existing interface.  I think
>  >  what you are saying (please correct me) is that in order to have a
>  >  trunked interface, or an interface that does 802.1q tagging, is to
>  >  have say:
>  >  eth0 inet 1.2.3.4
>  >  eth0:0.65 inet 2.3.4.5
>  >
>  >  ?  How do you tell the system it's supposed to be tagging
>  >  packets/frames?  I'm not sure what you mean.  In all fairness I use
>  >  vconfig to create my vlans, as that's the only way I know how to.  I
>
>  Current distributions can do that vconfig stuff for you within the
>  network configuration scripts. Depending on your distribution you have
>  to adapt your config files. No matter who configures your interfaces,
>  before you start heartbeat you should have one configured interface in
>  each lan/vlan e.g:

This functionality still requires the "vlan" package in order to do so.

>  eth0 with IP 1.2.3.4
>  eth0.65 with IP 2.3.4.5

Why do I need to waste IP addresses?  I don't need to for a native interface.

>  In your heartbeat config configure IPaddr2 resources where you
>  reference to "eth0.65", and you will end up with an alias on your vlan
>  tagged interface eth0.65:
>
>  eth0 with IP 1.2.3.4
>  eth0.65 with IP 2.3.4.5
>  eth0.65:0 with IP 2.3.4.7 <-- alias added by heartbeat

I suppose what is rather confusing is that I'm not being clear enough
in what I'm looking for.  I'm sure I already have my answer, but I'd
like to be sure.

In your example I _must_ waste an IP address per node in order to
allow heartbeat2 to cope with the lack of VLAN support?  Is this
correct?  It seems lazy to me, but I can accept it, and move on if
that is the case.

Originally I had asked is there any developmental thoughts on perhaps
getting VLANs directly supported by heartbeat2.  Maybe write an
IPaddr3 resource type??  Where can I submit this_idea_ if it hasn't
been considered yet?

Thanks for your time,

Chris-
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to