On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Chris Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > > > > Hmm I'm not sure how to configure the VLAN interface as you describe. > > > I am sure I need to build it as it's own device. It can't as far as I > > > know be a sub interface of an already existing interface. I think > > > what you are saying (please correct me) is that in order to have a > > > trunked interface, or an interface that does 802.1q tagging, is to > > > have say: > > > eth0 inet 1.2.3.4 > > > eth0:0.65 inet 2.3.4.5 > > > > > > ? How do you tell the system it's supposed to be tagging > > > packets/frames? I'm not sure what you mean. In all fairness I use > > > vconfig to create my vlans, as that's the only way I know how to. I > > > > Current distributions can do that vconfig stuff for you within the > > network configuration scripts. Depending on your distribution you have > > to adapt your config files. No matter who configures your interfaces, > > before you start heartbeat you should have one configured interface in > > each lan/vlan e.g: > > This functionality still requires the "vlan" package in order to do so.
yes > > > > eth0 with IP 1.2.3.4 > > eth0.65 with IP 2.3.4.5 > > Why do I need to waste IP addresses? I don't need to for a native interface. hmm ... yes, you are right. Should also work without. No need to waste an IP address ;-) > > > > In your heartbeat config configure IPaddr2 resources where you > > reference to "eth0.65", and you will end up with an alias on your vlan > > tagged interface eth0.65: > > > > eth0 with IP 1.2.3.4 > > eth0.65 with IP 2.3.4.5 > > eth0.65:0 with IP 2.3.4.7 <-- alias added by heartbeat > > I suppose what is rather confusing is that I'm not being clear enough > in what I'm looking for. I'm sure I already have my answer, but I'd > like to be sure. > > In your example I _must_ waste an IP address per node in order to > allow heartbeat2 to cope with the lack of VLAN support? Is this > correct? It seems lazy to me, but I can accept it, and move on if > that is the case. see above > > Originally I had asked is there any developmental thoughts on perhaps > getting VLANs directly supported by heartbeat2. Maybe write an > IPaddr3 resource type?? Where can I submit this_idea_ if it hasn't > been considered yet? It's all Open Source ... happy programming and share your code ;-) Regards, Andreas > > Thanks for your time, > > > > Chris- > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
