> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ha.org] Im Auftrag von Andrew Beekhof
> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2008 14:04
> An: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] DRBD Volumes won't get promoted
> 
> 
> On Jul 16, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Schmidt, Florian wrote:
> 
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Can anyone tell me, why my DRBD-Volumes won't get promoted to
> > master-state?
> >
> > They appear on both nodes only as started. In logs I don't find
> > anything
> > about failed promotion or something.
> >
> > ============
> > Last updated: Wed Jul 16 10:34:01 2008
> > Current DC: node2 (3a3820e2-3fd2-44ec-8fba-991ca4d20066)
> > 2 Nodes configured.
> > 1 Resources configured.
> > ============
> >
> > Node: node1 (cd70182b-d316-4cb0-82e4-12330afe7625): online
> > Node: node2 (3a3820e2-3fd2-44ec-8fba-991ca4d20066): online
> >
> > Master/Slave Set: DRBD
> >    Resource Group: DRBD:0
> >        DRBD_1:0      (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node1
> >        DRBD_2:0  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node 1
> >        DRBD_3:0        (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node1
> >        DRBD_4:0  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node1
> >    Resource Group: DRBD:1
> >        DRBD_1:1      (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >        DRBD_2:1  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >        DRBD_3:1        (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >        DRBD_4:1  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >
> > Could it have anything to do with:
> >
> > drbd[1429]:     2008/07/16_10:21:03 DEBUG: drbd_1: Command output: No
> > set matching id=master-cd70182b-d316-4cb0-82e4-12330afe7625 in status
> > drbd[1372]:     2008/07/16_10:21:03 DEBUG: drbd_2: Command output: No
> > set matching id=master-cd70182b-d316-4cb0-82e4-12330afe7625 in status
> 
> quite possibly.
> 
> what version are you running?  you _really_ should be using pacemaker
> 0.6.5


rpm -qa says:

pacemaker-heartbeat-0.6.1-5.3

But in the meantime I changed the config to use drbddisk, should I anyway use 
pacemaker 0.6.5?

 
> > If I promote it by hand via drbdadm primary all it shows:
> 
> thats not a good idea.
> because the cluster still thinks they should be slaves and (as you
> saw) will demote them again
> 
> >
> >
> > ============
> > Last updated: Wed Jul 16 11:12:04 2008
> > Current DC: node2 (3a3820e2-3fd2-44ec-8fba-991ca4d20066)
> > 2 Nodes configured.
> > 1 Resources configured.
> > ============
> >
> > Node: node1 (cd70182b-d316-4cb0-82e4-12330afe7625): online
> > Node: node2 (3a3820e2-3fd2-44ec-8fba-991ca4d20066): online
> >
> > Master/Slave Set: DRBD
> >    Resource Group: DRBD:0
> >        DRBD_1:0      (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Master node1 FAILED
> >        DRBD_2:0  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Master node1 FAILED
> >        DRBD_3:0        (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Master node1 FAILED
> >        DRBD_4:0  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Master node1 FAILED
> >    Resource Group: DRBD:1
> >        DRBD_1:1      (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >        DRBD_2:1  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >        DRBD_3:1        (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >        DRBD_4:1  (heartbeat::ocf:drbd):  Started node2
> >
> > Failed actions:
> >    DRBD_1:0_monitor_30000 (node=node1, call=67, rc=8): complete
> >    DRBD_2:0_monitor_30000 (node=node1, call=69, rc=8): complete
> >    DRBD_3:0_monitor_30000 (node=node1, call=71, rc=8): complete
> >    DRBD_4:0_monitor_30000 (node=node1, call=73, rc=8): complete
> >
> >
> > and then demotes the Master-resources again to idle in slave/slave
> > state.
> >
> > What can I do?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Florian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to