On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 14:23, Schmidt, Florian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> ha.org] Im Auftrag von Andrew Beekhof >> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2008 14:04 >> An: General Linux-HA mailing list >> Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] DRBD Volumes won't get promoted >> >> >> On Jul 16, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Schmidt, Florian wrote: >> >> > Hello again, >> > >> > Can anyone tell me, why my DRBD-Volumes won't get promoted to >> > master-state? >> > >> > They appear on both nodes only as started. In logs I don't find >> > anything >> > about failed promotion or something. >> > >> > ============ >> > Last updated: Wed Jul 16 10:34:01 2008 >> > Current DC: node2 (3a3820e2-3fd2-44ec-8fba-991ca4d20066) >> > 2 Nodes configured. >> > 1 Resources configured. >> > ============ >> > >> > Node: node1 (cd70182b-d316-4cb0-82e4-12330afe7625): online >> > Node: node2 (3a3820e2-3fd2-44ec-8fba-991ca4d20066): online >> > >> > Master/Slave Set: DRBD >> > Resource Group: DRBD:0 >> > DRBD_1:0 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node1 >> > DRBD_2:0 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node 1 >> > DRBD_3:0 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node1 >> > DRBD_4:0 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node1 >> > Resource Group: DRBD:1 >> > DRBD_1:1 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node2 >> > DRBD_2:1 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node2 >> > DRBD_3:1 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node2 >> > DRBD_4:1 (heartbeat::ocf:drbd): Started node2 >> > >> > Could it have anything to do with: >> > >> > drbd[1429]: 2008/07/16_10:21:03 DEBUG: drbd_1: Command output: No >> > set matching id=master-cd70182b-d316-4cb0-82e4-12330afe7625 in status >> > drbd[1372]: 2008/07/16_10:21:03 DEBUG: drbd_2: Command output: No >> > set matching id=master-cd70182b-d316-4cb0-82e4-12330afe7625 in status >> >> quite possibly. >> >> what version are you running? you _really_ should be using pacemaker >> 0.6.5 > > > rpm -qa says: > > pacemaker-heartbeat-0.6.1-5.3 > > But in the meantime I changed the config to use drbddisk, should I anyway use > pacemaker 0.6.5?
short answer: yes, .5 has less bugs than .1 long answer: if you're using master/slave functionality... absolutely :) _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
