Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Either way would work as you described it. The "custom driver", which > would just be a new stonith plugin doesn't look like very difficult > to implement. We're happy to see contributions :)
:) I will consider this even if I don't use it myself. > Whether that solution would work depends largely on your network > connectivity. How likely it is that neither node can fence the other > side? I would say that this is possible, but unlikely. If it happens, I am sure we have bigger and nastier problems to solve. > Also, if that happens, which would result in both nodes waiting > forever for the fencing operation, does that actually make any > difference to the users? If there's no network connectivity, no one is able to reach the database in the cluster anyway. Your answer made me wonder about what happens when the network comes back: will the cluster nodes be able to fence each other at that moment? What will probably happen to the cluster? Thank you very much for the answers. Kind regards. -- Luis Motta Campos is a software engineer, Perl Programmer, foodie and photographer. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
