On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 20:03, Bart Coninckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 28 November 2008 19:14, Alex Balashov wrote: >> > Fiew. Rocket-science. I kinda start to miss the old version 1 days ;-) >> >> You're not the only one. :-) > > Glad you feel my pain ;-)
It was one of those things that seemed like a really good idea at the time. Luckily, for the 1.0 series of Pacemaker, failure stickiness (which is what made the scoring so hard) has been dropped in favor of something far simpler. Its explained here: http://clusterlabs.org/mw/Image:Configuration_Explained.pdf _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
