On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:23, Bart Coninckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 29 November 2008 09:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 20:03, Bart Coninckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> > On Friday 28 November 2008 19:14, Alex Balashov wrote: >> >> > Fiew. Rocket-science. I kinda start to miss the old version 1 days ;-) >> >> >> >> You're not the only one. :-) >> > >> > Glad you feel my pain ;-) >> >> It was one of those things that seemed like a really good idea at the time. >> Luckily, for the 1.0 series of Pacemaker, failure stickiness (which is >> what made the scoring so hard) has been dropped in favor of something >> far simpler. >> >> Its explained here: >> http://clusterlabs.org/mw/Image:Configuration_Explained.pdf > > > Hmm, looks interesting. When will this be released?
It was released back in October and had its first update a couple of weeks ago. > Will it work on heartbeat-2.0.x? No - but mostly because the package managers complain about all the duplicate files (since all the Pacemaker files still exist in the old versions of Heartbeat). See http://www.clusterlabs.org/mw/Install _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
