But would I still say:
firewall.foo.com 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.4 10.10.10.5 192.168.1.1 ldirectord
in haresources?
I was assuming that putting l92.168.1.1 and ldirector on the same line
would put 192.168.1.1 under ldirector control and imply a LVS pool would
need to be created for 192.168.1.1. I do not want a pool for
192.168.1.1, I just want simple IP failover between nodes. Would I not
express my config as
firewall.foo.com 10.10.10.1 10.10.10.4 10.10.10.5 ldirectord
firewall.foo.com 192.168.1.1
Or can you only have one line per hostname in ha.conf? I could just as
easily rewrite the second line as
firewall-int.foo.com 192.168.1.1
Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
Chris,
Sounds good to me.
As long as the master heartbeat node has all of the VIPs + the
internal default gateway then your fail over should work fine.
i.e. both internal and external clients/servers won't realise anything
has changed.
And you can still do individual server administration with the fixed IPs.
First, does my clarification above make sense? Second, would I still declare
192.168.1.1 and 10.10.10.1, 10.10.10.4, 10.10.10.5, etc, IP's as you descibe
below in haresources?
Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
