Ciao,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:31:30PM +0200, Cristina Bulfon wrote:
> Ciao,
>
> I will open a bugzilla.. I should be expert now :-)
:)
> and yes the device name is the same .. do you have some xml example to
> show me ?
Sure:
<clone id="Fence-clone">
<instance_attributes>
<attributes>
<nvpair name="clone_max" value="2"/>
<nvpair name="clone_node_max" value="1"/>
</attributes>
</instance_attributes>
<primitive id="fencedev" class="stonith" type="external/sbd">
<operations>
<op name="monitor" interval="120s" timeout="60s" prereq="nothing"/>
<op name="start" timeout="60s" prereq="nothing"/>
</operations>
<instance_attributes>
<attributes>
<nvpair name="sbd_device" value="YOUR disk device"/>
</attributes>
</instance_attributes>
</primitive>
</clone>
Basically, all stonith configurations are the same. Just change
the instance attributes and timeouts. This example may or may not
work, perhaps there are some ids missing, didn't try XML for such
a long time :)
Thanks,
Dejan
> thanks
>
> cristina
> On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> > Ciao,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:04:23PM +0200, Cristina Bulfon wrote:
> >> Ciao,
> >>
> >> I've configured a SBD device for checking the Shared disk trough the
> >> SAN.
> >> My 2 node cluster have installed a Dual Path Qlogic FC cards with
> >> failover, if i try to unplug
> >> one FC port on my active machine .. SBD does the reboot to the
> >> machine
> >> w/o
> >> waiting for the failover. Reading the http://www.linux-ha.org/SBD_Fencing
> >>
> >> I can manage the timeout parameters but it doesn't work on my
> >> machines, I get
> >> invalid option
> >>
> >> sbd -d /dev/AFS/sdg -4 20 -1 10 create
> >>
> >> sbd: invalid option -- 4
> >
> > Please file a bugzilla for this.
> >
> >> I am using heartbeat 2.1.4 and I cannot move up since my python
> >> version is 2.3.4
> >>
> >> For testing SBD with HA I've created a simple resource and it has
> >> been
> >> worked,
> >> but I saw that most of the people create a clone. Which is the best
> >> way to use SBD ?
> >
> > I think clones should be OK, of course if you use the same device
> > name on all nodes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dejan
> >
> >> Any hint for the xml configuration to use SBD with 2 node cluster ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> PS: next week I will be read email time to time, sorry in advance if
> >> I cannot answer soon.
> >>
> >> cristina
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-HA mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
