On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Bennett, Justin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The system I work on currently uses Heartbeat to manage 6 or so virtual IP 
> addresses on the network.  We have several pairs of nodes that each serve as 
> primary/secondary nodes for this IP addresses.  These are fairly typical and 
> easy heartbeat setups, so my knowledge of heartbeat doesn't go awfully deep.
>
> I was recently asked if, for the next iteration of our system, we could have 
> a heartbeat configuration that would allow one node to serve as the backup 
> for multiple primary nodes.

The short answer is "yes".
Run Pacemaker on top of Heartbeat and you can pretty much have any
kind of failover strategy you can dream up.

> For example, if we have three servers that are each the primary for the 
>separate virtual IP address, could we (instead of having a matching backup 
>node for each primary) have just one backup node that would be capable of 
>taking over any or all of those virtual IP addresses if the other nodes fail.
>
> I don't see this capability spelled out in any of the documentation (at least 
> not explicitly) so I wondered if any of you have any experience which a 
> configuration like this.
>
> Thank you very much for your help.
>
> Justin Bennett
>
> ---
> Justin Bennett
> Systems Engineer Asc.
> Lockheed Martin - MS2
> Syracuse, NY
> Phone: 315.456.4084
> Email: [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to